Central Europe Review find out about advertising in CER
Vol 3, No 6
12 February 2001
 CER INFO 
front page 
overview 
our awards 
CER cited 
subscribe 
advertising 
classifieds 
submissions 
jobs at CER 
internships 
CER Direct 
e-mail us 
 ARCHIVES 
year 2000 
year 1999 
by subject 
by author 
EU Focus 
kinoeye 
books 
press 
news 
search 
 MORE 
ebookstore 
pbookshop 
music shop 
video store 
find books 
conferences 
diacritics 
FreeMail 
papers 
Crowns 
links 

 

Sam Vaknin Unemployment:
The case of
Macedonia

Part three of a six-part series
Sam Vaknin

Read part one of Sam Vaknin's unemployment series of articles first.
Read part two of the series.

It would be wrong to say that Macedonia has neglected to tackle the social cancer of unemployment.

In 1998, Macedonia decided to give unemployment benefits to the employer—not to the unemployed. While Israel used unemployment benefits to directly subsidize wages by reimbursing the employer—Macedonia has chosen to do so by waiving payroll taxes and subsidizing them in the long term. Unfortunately, the law was cancelled in 1999, with widespread abuses by employers cited as the reason.

Macedonia briefly considered (though rejected as inapplicable) the British experiment with communities of unemployed.

The British experience was to assemble all those unemployed in a specific geographic region into a "community." The community included a wide variety of professions: carpenters and tailors, electricians and farm hands, gardeners and teachers. A computerized centre was set up. Each unemployed person registered with this centre, listing both his professional skills and goods and services that he was interested in, but did not have the money to purchase.

A matching process then ensued: the tailor was looking for a teacher to give his children some private lessons (which he could not afford in his current financial straits). The teacher was looking for a tailor to saw a communion dress for her daughter. So, the computer matched them up: The teacher tutored the tailor's children in return for his services in sewing the dress for her daughter. Both of them were thus employed, recovering their sense of self-worth and dignity. Moreover, both of them were able to afford things which were badly needed by them but which they could afford under other circumstances.

But who will determine how many private lessons provided by the teacher are worth one dress sewed by the tailor?

A special tariff was published. It reflected the conditions which prevailed in the "real" marketplace in which real money changed hands. To ease the "payment" process, special community money was printed in lieu of the unemployment benefits which the government used to dole out to the members of the community. Now, each member of the community received from the Government a monthly allowance in community money (instead of real money) which he or she was able to use only with other, also unemployed members of the community.

This way, the purchasing power of the unemployed was used exclusively with the other unemployed, easing their overall situation. It also eased the government's predicament—because it did not have to print additional money to pay out unemployment benefits.

This was a return to primordial, pre-monetary, barter economy. But it is precisely the kind of economy that prevails in Macedonia. In a way, Macedonian society—tribal and local patriotic as it is—provided a social safety net to the unemployed by spontaneously fostering numerous barter communities.

The true picture

Yet, Macedonia failed spectacularly in tackling its unemployment. The first problem facing decision-makers is that no one in Macedonia knows the real picture. How many are employed and not reported or registered? How many are registered as unemployed but really have a job? How many are part-time workers and how many work full time? How many are officially employed (de jure) but de facto unemployed or severely underemployed? How many are on "indefinite" vacations, on leave without pay, etc?

The Statistics Bureau was never instructed to make the gathering and analysis of data regarding the unemployed (through household surveys and census, if necessary) a top priority.

To generate a truer picture, the state has decided to declare a limited amnesty pertaining violations of worker registration by employers. All employers are to be given 30 days to register all their unregistered and unreported workers without any penalty, retroactive or prospective (amnesty). Afterwards, labour inspectors should embark on sampling raids. Employers caught violating the labour laws should be heavily penalized. In severe cases, closures should be enforced against the workplace.

Currently, all unemployed people must register with the Employment Bureau once a month, whether they are receiving benefits, or not. Non-compliance automatically triggers the loss of the status of "unemployed." If a person does not register without good cause, he has the right to re-register, but his "unemployment tenure" re-commences from month one with the new registration.

The Statistics Bureau implements a households' survey in addition to a claimant count. Labour force surveys are conducted at regular intervals regarding the structure of the workforce, its geographical distribution, the pay structure, employment time probabilities. A Standard National Job Classification is in the works.

The unemployment benefits

Unemployment benefits—if excessive and wrongly applied—are self-perpetuating because they provide a strong disincentive to work.

Unemployment benefits should be means tested. There is no reason to pay unemployment benefits to the children of a multi-millionaire. An unemployed person with assets (especially liquid assets) should not receive benefits, even if they are otherwise eligible. The benefits should scale down in accordance with wealth and income. Yet, Macedonia has rejected this sensible approach. Entrenched interests—mainly inside the civil service, the major locus of illicit wealth accumulation—have hampered any discussion of means-tested social benefits.

Macedonia's unemployment benefits are well-structured to provide an incentive to work. They are limited in time, decrease gradually and withheld from certain segments of the population, such as school dropouts, those who never held a job.

Eligibility to unemployment benefits is confined to those made redundant immediately prior to the receipt of the benefits, who are available to work by registering in an employment bureau, who are actively seeking employment
Send this article to a friend
(though they are not subjected to a means test). Benefits are withheld from people who resigned voluntarily or discharged due to misconduct or criminal behaviour. In Macedonia (as in the USA), unemployment compensation is not available to farm workers, domestic servants, the briefly employed, government workers and the self-employed.

Unemployment benefits in Macedonia do not exceed short-term sickness benefits (as they do in Canada, Denmark and the Netherlands) but are substantially lower (as is the case in Greece, Germany and Hungary). In other countries in transition, even if sickness benefits are earnings-related, unemployment benefits are flat (as is the case in Bulgaria and Italy). In no country in transition are sickness benefits or unemployment benefits means tested (as is the case in Australia and New Zealand).

Macedonia—prompted by the World Bank—has embarked on the path of reducing the replacement rate of unemployment benefits to between 40 and 50 percent of net average monthly wages in the first six months of benefits and to between 30 and 40 percent of net average monthly wages thereafter in the next six months.

Unemployment benefits in Macedonia are limited in time. In Bulgaria, they are limited to 13 weeks, in Israel, Hungary, Italy and the Netherlands to 6 months and in France, Germany, Luxemburg and the United Kingdom to 12 months. Only in Belgium are unemployment benefits not limited in their duration. In most of these, countries, though, social welfare payments replace unemployment benefits following the prescribed period of time, but they are usually lower than the unemployment benefits and serve as a disincentive to remain unemployed rather than employed.

In Macedonia, the duration of unemployment benefits is a whopping 18 months—far too long. Moreover, the unemployed (even the long-term ones) are eligible to have their health insurance paid by the state. Unemployment benefits are payable to a person who refuses work offered to him or her on any grounds (even if not medical grounds). All these serve as disincentives to find work and hold on to it.

Sam Vaknin, 12 February 2001

Part four of this series of six articles will appear in next week's CER

The author:

The author is General Manager of Capital Markets Institute Ltd, a consultancy firm with operations in Macedonia and Russia. He is an Economic Advisor to the Government of Macedonia.

DISCLAIMER: The views presented in this article represent only the personal opinions and judgements of the author.

Moving on:

After the Rain cover


After the Rain:
How the West Lost the East

Sam Vaknin's book on sale from CER as a print book and as an ebook

Read an external review

 

THIS WEEK:
Jan Čulík
Czech Census

Gusztáv Kosztolányi
Hungary's Century

Brian J Požun
The Burden of History

Oliver Craske
The EU in Wonderland

Andreas Beckmann
Not So Green

Kinoeye:
Michael Brooke
Russian Invasion

Books:
Eleanor Pritchard
Who Are the Macedonians?

eBooks:
Štěpán Kotrba NEW!
Sow and Reap

Brian J Požun
Shedding the Balkan Skin

Martin D Brown
Czech Historical Amnesia

Dejan Anastasijević (ed)
Out of Time

Gusztáv Kosztolányi
Hungarian Oil Scandal

Sam Vaknin
After the Rain

Press Reviews:
Andrea Mrozek
Who Needs Czechs?

Letters:
Mihailo Jovović
Breaking Up is Easy

News:
Albania
Austria
Bosnia
Croatia
Czech
Estonia
EU/NATO
Finland
Germany
Hungary
Kosovo
Latvia
Lithuania
Macedonia
Poland
Roma
Romania
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Ukraine

CER eBookclub Members enter here